Cyber Resilience uplift
Cube Cyber's resilience uplift converts an incident or a near miss into a structurally stronger position: the exploited gaps closed, the architecture, identity and detection weaknesses the event exposed hardened, and the response capability that struggled rebuilt. An incident is the most expensive security assessment an organisation ever receives; uplift is how you collect on it, delivered by the same firm that can design, test and monitor the fixes.
Talk To Us About Resilience Uplift
The post-incident window closes faster than organisations expect:
The obvious moment is immediately after an incident, ideally as investigation findings land, while organisational will and budget are aligned and the facts are fresh. The equally valuable moments are subtler: after a near miss, when you were lucky and know it; after an incident at a peer, when your board asks would that have worked on us; and at insurance renewal or regulatory review, when the improvements must be evidenced. Uplift scoped from a real event outperforms generic uplift because the priorities argue for themselves.
Core capabilities & deliverables
Post-incident review
A structured review of what happened and why, technical root causes and the process and decision failures around them, producing a prioritised uplift plan with owners.
Root cause remediation
The exploited weaknesses actually closed: the initial access path, the privilege that enabled movement, the segmentation that failed to contain, the backup exposure, engineering, not recommendations, drawing on our architecture and infrastructure practices.
Detection and response hardening
The gaps the incident revealed in visibility and response engineered out: telemetry completed, detections built for the tradecraft that succeeded, playbooks rewritten from experience, verified by control validation and, where wanted, purple team exercise.
Architecture and identity uplift
The structural fixes incidents most often demand, segmentation, privileged access overhaul, backup isolation, delivered as staged programs sequenced for fast risk reduction, the transformation service, focused by the incident's evidence.
Resilience validation
Independent verification that the uplift holds: testing against the original attack path, validation of the rebuilt controls, and an exercise that rehearses the improved response, closure you can evidence, not just claim.
Stakeholder assurance support
The improvement story told credibly to those now asking: board reporting, remediation evidence and customer assurances, grounded in the verified work rather than adjectives.
Uplift runs as a focused program in four stages:
Review
Post-incident review and prioritisation, anchored in investigation findings where they exist, and honest about process failures as well as technical ones.
Remediate
Root causes closed first, the changes that would have prevented or contained this incident, sequenced for immediate risk reduction.
Harden
The broader weaknesses the incident illuminated addressed: detection coverage, response capability, architecture and identity debt.
Validate
Testing, exercising and evidence, the uplift proven against the very scenario that started it, and the assurance stakeholders now require, delivered.
Uplift work aligns to NIST SP 800-61's lessons-learned discipline and ACSC guidance, strengthens Essential Eight maturity positions, supports APRA CPS 234 remediation expectations and SOCI program obligations, and integrates the full Cube Cyber lifecycle, the incident tells us where; architecture, engineering, testing and monitoring deliver the fix and keep it fixed.
NIST SP 800-61ACSC Guidelines
APRASOCIFrequently asked questions
Because recovery restores operations, not security, the environment that was breached is now running again, with the same weaknesses, minus one attacker who knows them intimately. Repeat incidents are common precisely because the post-incident window closes unused. The uplift converts what the incident cost into what it taught, and the economics strongly favour doing it while the lesson is fresh.
Focus and evidence. Generic uplift argues from frameworks; post-incident uplift argues from what demonstrably just happened, which makes prioritisation sharper, business cases self-evident and organisational will available. The scope is bounded by the incident's lessons rather than a maturity model's wishlist, so it lands faster and proves itself against a real scenario.
No. Uplift regularly follows investigations by other firms or internal teams, we work from their findings, deepening them where gaps remain. What matters is an honest account of what happened; where that is missing, a compact review rebuilds it, and the uplift proceeds on facts either way.
Root-cause remediation, the fixes that would have stopped this incident, typically lands within weeks. The broader hardening runs as a staged program over months, sized to what the incident exposed, with every stage delivering standalone risk reduction. Validation closes each stage, so progress is proven, not just reported.
The ability to take a hit and keep operating, prevention matters, but resilience assumes some attack eventually lands, and asks how far it spreads, how fast it is seen, and how quickly you recover. Uplift builds exactly that: containment through architecture, visibility through detection, recovery through tested backups and rehearsed response. Resilient organisations have incidents; they just stop having disasters.
We're here to help.
Talk to a practitioner, not a call centre. Tell us what you're trying to solve and we'll come back to you within one business day. If you're dealing with an active incident, call us directly.
Send us a message
Tell us what you're trying to solve and we'll get back to you within one business day.
We use the details you provide to respond to your enquiry. Your information is stored in our Microsoft 365 environment and handled in line with our Privacy Policy, which explains how to access or correct it and how to make a complaint.